7th Circuit Precedent regarding Asylum: Osorio-Morales v. Garland, 72 F.4th 738 (7th Cir. 2023)

M elvin Osorio-Morales sought asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture due to a deadly feud between his family and the Hernandez family in Honduras. The Immigration Judge (IJ) and Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denied his petitions on the basis that the feud was private and not government-sanctioned, and the government was not seen as unwilling or unable to protect him. Osorio-Morales appealed this decision.

Arguments:

  • Petitioner's Arguments: Osorio-Morales argued he was in danger due to the family feud and the Honduran government would not or could not protect him.
  • Respondent's Arguments: The government contended that the violence was a private matter and that the Honduran government had taken steps to protect its citizens, implying they were not unwilling or unable to protect the petitioner.

Holding: 

The court denied Osorio-Morales's petition for review, affirming the decision of the IJ and BIA that the Honduran government was not shown to be unable or unwilling to protect him from the family feud.

Cases and Statutes Relied Upon:

  • Immigration and Nationality Act ('INA'): Defines the requirements for asylum and withholding of removal.
  • N.L.A. v. Holder (2014): Indicates that family members' past harm cannot be considered in an individual's asylum claim if not directed at them.
  • Minghai Tian v. Holder (2014): Sets the substantial evidence standard for review.
  • Vahora v. Holder (2013): Discusses the requirement that persecution must be inflicted by the government or by actors it cannot or will not control.
  • Bitsin v. Holder (2013): Upheld a government's ability to protect individuals if it took some steps toward that end.
  • Chetri v. Lynch (2015): Suggests that governments are not "unable or unwilling" to protect if they take action when prodded.
  • Jonaitiene v. Holder (2011): Addresses the expectation that asylum seekers should seek help from authorities to demonstrate a government's unwillingness or inability to protect them.

Legal Implications:

The case reaffirms the principle that asylum cannot be granted based solely on a private dispute unless there is compelling evidence that the government is unable or unwilling to offer protection. It emphasizes the requirement for asylum seekers to demonstrate a well-founded fear of persecution linked to government action or inaction, rather than private violence. It also clarifies the burden of proof on asylum seekers to establish their eligibility for asylum and the higher standard for withholding of removal.

< Older Post Newer Post >

How Legal Representation Can Help Maximize Your Insurance Claim

By nasser • August 1, 2025
Maximize your insurance claim with expert legal representation! Discover how an attorney can simplify the claims process, advocate for your rights, and help you secure the compensation you deserve.

Understanding Your Rights as a Victim in a Personal Injury Case

By nasser • July 31, 2025
Empower yourself by understanding your rights as a victim in a personal injury case. This comprehensive guide will help you navigate the legal landscape and ensure you receive the compensation you deserve after an accident or injury.

How Negligent Security Can Lead to Personal Injury Liability

By nasser • July 30, 2025
Discover how negligent security can expose property owners to personal injury liability and learn essential steps to protect yourself and your rights. This blog post breaks down the legal implications and preventive measures to ensure safety for all.

How to Strengthen Your Case in a Premises Liability Claim

By nasser • July 29, 2025
Learn how to effectively strengthen your premises liability claim with essential strategies and expert tips to improve your chances of a successful outcome. Don't navigate the complexities of your case alone—discover the steps you need to take today!

What to Do After a Slip and Fall Injury on Someone Else’s Property

By nasser • July 28, 2025
Learn the essential steps to take after a slip and fall injury on someone else's property, from seeking medical attention to understanding your legal rights, ensuring you protect yourself and navigate the recovery process effectively.

Understanding the Legal Process for Wrongful Death Claims

By nasser • July 25, 2025
Navigate the complex legal process of wrongful death claims with confidence. This guide provides essential steps and insights to help you seek justice and compensation for your loss.

A Guide to Navigating Homeowners Insurance Claims After Storm Damage

By nasser • July 24, 2025
Learn how to navigate homeowners insurance claims after storm damage with our comprehensive guide, ensuring you get the compensation you deserve while minimizing stress. Discover essential steps, from understanding your policy to documenting damage and working with adjusters.

When to Call a Lawyer After a Boating Accident in Florida

By nasser • July 23, 2025
Discover when to call a lawyer after a boating accident in Florida to protect your rights and secure the compensation you deserve. This essential guide will help you navigate the complexities of legal action following a boating incident.

The Importance of Timely Legal Action in Personal Injury Cases

By nasser • July 22, 2025
Acting quickly in personal injury cases is crucial for preserving evidence and ensuring your legal rights are protected. Don't risk losing your chance for compensation—learn why timely legal action matters!

Understanding Your Rights After a Car Accident in Florida

By nasser • July 21, 2025
Learn your rights after a car accident in Florida to ensure you receive the compensation you deserve. This essential guide covers immediate steps to take, your rights as an accident victim, and how to navigate the insurance claim process.
Show More